PRINCIPLE: Whoever wrongfully restrains any person in such a ma

Previous Year Papers

Download Solved Question Papers Free for Offline Practice and view Solutions Online.

Test Series

Take Zigya Full and Sectional Test Series. Time it out for real assessment and get your results instantly.

Test Yourself

Practice and master your preparation for a specific topic or chapter. Check you scores at the end of the test.
Advertisement

 Multiple Choice QuestionsMultiple Choice Questions

71.

PRINCIPLE: Nothing which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm FACT: A fake doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of haemorrahage.

  •  Doctor is guilty of murder

  • Doctor is not guilty

  •  Doctor is guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. He exercised his right of private defence under a mistake of fact. He was under the belief that A and B were fighting. He is justified in exercising his right of private defence.

  •  Doctor is guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. He exercised his right of private defence under a mistake of fact. He was under the belief that A and B were fighting. He is justified in exercising his right of private defence.

28 Views

72.

PRINCIPLE: Whoever dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use any movable property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

FACT: A finds a diamond ring, not knowing to whom it belongs. He sells it immediately to a jeweller.

  •  A is guilty of Criminal Misappropriation

  •  A is not guilty of Criminal Misappropriation

  •  A is guilty of cheating

  •  A is guilty of cheating

26 Views

73.

PRINCIPLE: voluntary drunkenness is not a Defence under ss.85 and 86 of the Code

FACT: A has in his possession a bottle of poisonous lotion for external application and a bottle of medicine for internal use. A in a drunken condition gives to his child an ounce of the poisonous lotion to drink as result of which the child died. Is A guilty of any offence?

)

  •  A is guilty of’ death caused by rash and negligent act.

  • A is guilty of murder

  •  A is not guilty since he is in a drunken state. A cannot take ‘drunkenness’ as a defence as voluntary drunkenness is not a Defence under ss.85 and 86 of the Code.

  •  A is not guilty since he is in a drunken state. A cannot take ‘drunkenness’ as a defence as voluntary drunkenness is not a Defence under ss.85 and 86 of the Code.

26 Views

74.

PRINCIPLE: Attempt to murder is punishable under S.307 IPC but preparation is not an offence.

FACT: A mixes sugar, thinking that it was poison in the tea meant for B with an intention to cause his death. What offence, if any, has been committed by A?
(a)
(b) 

(c) 

  •  A is not liable to be punished for any offence. ‘A’ has done only preparation, for the commission of crime

  • A is liable for attempt to murder

  • He is guilty of criminal conspiracy

  • He is guilty of criminal conspiracy

27 Views

Advertisement
75.

PRINCIPLE: By virtue of s. 330 of the Code, if a person voluntarily causes hurt for the purpose of extorting confession from the sufferer or any information which may lead to the detection of an offence, he shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine

FACT: X, a police officer tortures Y, to tell him where the stolen property was kept by him. Has A committed any offence?

 

  • X is not liable since he is discharging his duty.

  • X is liable since the custodial torture is not part of duty

  • X is not liable since the torture was to extract confession.

  • X is not liable since the torture was to extract confession.

30 Views

76.

PRINCIPLE: “Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”

FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.

  •  Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house

  •  Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realised Jeevan’s delicate nature

  • Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevan

  • Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevan

30 Views

Advertisement

77.

PRINCIPLE: Whoever wrongfully restrains any person in such a manner as to prevent that person from proceedings beyond certain circumscribing limits, is said “wrongfully to confine” that person.

FACT: A places men with fire arms at the outlets of a building, and tells B that he will fire at, if B attempts to leave the building.

  • A is guilty of wrongful restraints

  • A is guilty of wrongful confinement

  •  A is not guilty since it is a preparation only.

  •  A is not guilty since it is a preparation only.


B.

A is guilty of wrongful confinement

28 Views

Advertisement
78.

A promise not supported by consideration is called

  •  Proposal
  •  Nudum pactum

  •  Acceptance

  •  Acceptance

26 Views

Advertisement
79. Assertion (A):  A void contract is not necessarily illegal
Reason (R): Every illegal contract is void.
  •  Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A

  •  Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A

  • A is true but R is false

  • A is true but R is false

26 Views

80. Assertion (A):  The Indian Constitution was adopted on 26th November, 1949.
Reason (R):  Law Day is celebrated in India on 26th November every year.
  •  Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A

  •  Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A

  •  A is true but R is false

  •  A is true but R is false

27 Views

Advertisement