A goes to grocery shop of B which has frequented quite often for his requirements

A: I want ten bags of old rice

B: Here is the rice you are looking for 

A buys ten bags of rice from B and subsequently discovers that the rice supplied is not really old. A files a suit against B.

•  A will not succeed because A should have verified the quality of rice himself

•  A will not succeed because B agreed to supply the rice of A's specifications

• A will not succeed because B did not promise him to supply old rice

• A will not succeed because B did not promise him to supply old rice

 A is running a polyclinic well equipped with operation theatres and supporting staff. S is surgeon who makes use of this polyclinc to operate his patients. While operating a patient, P, due to the negligence of a nurse (who was support staff of polyclinic), the surgical knife was left inside the abdomen of P. P developed several complications.  Advice P as to against whom i.e. A or S, he should file the suit for damages.

• A should be sued because N was the staff nurse of his polclinic

• S should be sued because has was responsible for whatever was done during the operation

•  S should be sued because he should have selected a better staff nurse

•  S should be sued because he should have selected a better staff nurse

 An adopted child shall be deemed to be the child of the adoptive patents with effect from the date of adoption, and from this date, the child's relations with the natural parents shall be replaced by its relations with the adopted parents

X was born into a prosperous Hindu to join the family, Under Hindu Law, X is entitled to share in the property inherited by his father front his grandfather. X was given in adoption to another person, namely, M. After adoption, there was partition in the erstwhile family of X. X claimed a share in the course of partition.

• X will succeed because, by virtue of being born into a family, X should get a share in the family property

•  X will not succeed because he is entitled to the properties of the adoptive parents only

• none of the above

 No one can accept a proposal without any knowledge thereof

Rames proposed to give a reward of Rs. 1000/-to anyone informing him the whereabout of his lost dog. The proposal was was printed in a daily newspaper by name " The daily observer", on 11.1.1994. On 3rd January, Rahim, one of his friends happened to see the dog and informed Ramesh about it. Ramesh immediately rushed to the spot and collected the dog. At that time, neither Rahim knew about the award (since he was not a regular reader of the Daily observer), nor Ramesh mentioned anything about the award. On the 5th January Rahim came to know about the announcement of the award through a friend of him and he demanded the reward of Rs. 1000/- from Ramesh. Ramesh refused to pay.

• Ramesh need not pay the amount because the promise made only to the readers of the Daily Observer

•  Ramesh need not to pay the amount, because he had given the information without knowing about the reward

•  Ramesh ha to pay teh amount, he had promised to pay the amount to anyone giving the information about the dog

•  Ramesh ha to pay teh amount, he had promised to pay the amount to anyone giving the information about the dog

Whoever intending to take dishonestly any property out of the possession of another person, does that property for such taking, is said to commit theft

Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matter. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into his pocket. Subsequently, the forget about it. Since the pen happened to be very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Ramesh's house.

• Suresh did not commit theft because he did not have the dishonest intention

• Suresh committed theft because he failed to return the pen

• Suresh committed the because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent

• Suresh committed the because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent

96.

A person who through his words or actions leads others to believe that he is associated with a partnership business shall be liable to the acts of partnership firm

A and B were running a partnership business in a small town. When business an into difficulties, A and B raised a loan from a  local bank and R, an influential man of the locality told as a guarantor.D came to know of his transaction and subsequently happened to advance Rs. 50,000/- to the partnership business believing that R was associated with the business as a partner. But when the firm failed to repay the amount, D brought a suit against R for payment.

• R is liable because through his conduct as a guarantor he led D to believe that he was associated with the partnership business.

•  R is not liable because the act of guaranteeing extends only to a particular transaction

•  R is not liable because he never intended D to associate him with the business

•  R is not liable because he never intended D to associate him with the business

 A partner has implied authority to raise a loan  on behalf of the partnership business if it is necessary for the usual course of business

A, B, & C are partners in a firm of Charted Accountants.They had agreed that none of them would contract a loan in the name of the firm without the consent of all the partners. Nevertheless, A  took a loan from a Bank in the name of the firm and spend the money for his personal purposes. The bank demanded the repayment from the partnership firm.

• the partnership firm is liable because A had acted as a partner while raising the loan

•  the partnership firm is not liable because raising a loan is not in the usual course of business in this case

• the partnership firm is not liable as the partners had unanimously agreed that none of them would raise a loan in the name of the firm 

• the partnership firm is not liable as the partners had unanimously agreed that none of them would raise a loan in the name of the firm 

• Six

• four

• five

• five

 The government of India has launched Modified Special Incentive Proposal Scheme (M-SIPS) for which of the following sectors?

• Electronic sector

• Automobile sector

• Agriculture sector 

• Agriculture sector 

The SAARC motor vehicles agreement was approved in which SAARC summit?

• 19th Summit

• 18th Summit

• 16th Summit

• 16th Summit