Multiple Choice QuestionsBoth A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is false but R is true
A is false but R is true
Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true but R is false
A is true but R is false
Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true but R is false
A is true but R is false
Assertion (A): A person claims compensation for his non-gratuitous act.
Reason (R): A person who enjoys benefit from lawful, non-gratuitous act of another must compensate him even though there is no contract.
Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true but R is false
A is true but R is false
Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true but R is false
A is true but R is false
Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true but R is false
A is true but R is false
C.
A is true but R is false
Federalism implies a system of government which embodies a division of powers between a central and a number of regional authorities
Federalism implies a system of government which embodies a division of powers between Legislature, Executive and Judiciary
Federalism implies a system of Government which embodies Parliamentary supremacy
Federalism implies a system of Government which embodies Parliamentary supremacy
A master shall be liable for the acts of his servants done in the course of the employment.
Facts- HMT, a public sector undertaking, is operating a number bus services for its employees in Bangalore. These buses are quite distinct in their appearance and carry the board 'for HMT employees only'. M, a villager for neighbouring state, was waiting for a regular bus in one of the bus stops in Bangalore. A bus belonging to HMT happened to stop nearby and a number of people got into the bus. M, without realizing that it was HMT bus, got into the bus and soon thereafter, the met an accident. M seeks to file against HMT claiming damages.
a.
M will not succeed because it was for him to find out whether it was a public transport
M will succeed because the driver was anyhow duty bound to drive carefully
M will succeed because he got into the bus without realizing that it was HMT bus
M will succeed because he got into the bus without realizing that it was HMT bus
9
10
11
11
Article 225
Article 226
Article 227
Article 227
Switch
