---

Western Secularism	Indian Secularism
State supported religious reforms allowed	Strict non–interference of religion and state in each other is affairs
Equality between different sects of religion is emphasised.	Equality between different religious groups is a key concern.
Less attention to a community based rights	Attention to minority rights.
Individual and his rights at the centre	Rights of both individual and religious communities protected.

---

Secularism is a doctrine that opposes any form of religious and intra-religious domination. It does not oppose religion itself.

Secularism cannot be equated with religious tolerance as tolerance may be compatible with religious domination by one group. However, religious tolerance is one of the components of secularism.

---

The explaination:

(i)The secular character of the Indian state is established by virtue of the fact that it is neither theocratic nor has it established any one or multiple religions.

(ii)Beyond that it has adopted a very sophisticated policy in pursuit of religious equality. This allows it either to disengage with religion in American style, or engage with it if required.

(iii)The Indian state may engage with religion negatively to oppose religious tyranny. This is reflected in such actions as the ban on untouchability. It may also choose a positive mode of engagement.

(iv)Thus, the Indian Constitution grants all religious minorities the right to establish and maintain their own educational institutions which may receive assistance from the state. All these complex strategies can be adopted by the state to promote the values of peace, freedom and equality. 

---

(a) Absence of domination of one religious group by another is compatible with the ideas of secularism as it allows freedom to all religious groups.

(b) Recognition of a state religion is not compatible with the idea of secularism because it fails to recognize other religious group.

(c) Equal state support to all religions is compatible as it treats all religion equally.

(d) Mandatory prayers in schools is not compatible with the idea of secularism because all human being are not religious.

(e) It is not compatible with the idea of secularism as it grants special priviledge to minorities at the cost of majority.

(f)It is not compatible with the idea of secularism as it is direct involvement of state or government in religious affairs.

(g) It is compatible with the idea of secularism because as the state has right to protect the weaker section os society.

---

(a) I disagree. Secularism does  allow us to have a religious identity. It gives equal respect to all religion. 

(b)Secularism is against inequality both within a religious group and between different religious groups. The Indian government maintains equality within religious groups to prevent discrimination and eradicate practices that are exploitative for an individual.

(c) I oppose this statement. India evolved a variant of secularism that is not just an implant from the west on Indian soil. The fact is that the secularism has both western and nonwestern origins. In the west, it was the Church-state separation which was central and in countries such as India, the ideas of peaceful co-existence of different religious communities has been important.